Skip to main content

Head meet wall

On the back of a not very good morning on the back of a few not very good weeks I’m taking to the blog once again if not to complain then to vent my anger.
This morning a member of my supervisory team introduced a new researcher to the rest of us, when getting to my work she said (and I’m paraphrasing) ‘She does something with…well drama…well why don’t you explain’ Then went on to introduce the others with ‘they’re IT experts, oh she does work you’ll be interested in and her work is fascinating.’
So everyone else is either fascinating or an expert but she can’t even bring herself to explain what my work is? I have two theories on this, neither of which fill me with hope or joy with regard to my current position.
First is that a member of my supervisory team still doesn’t fully understand what I’m doing or trying to do. I should note that it wouldn’t have been too hard to wing it because above my computer is a giant poster with the title of my research on it. I have a viva with this person in a month, how can I be interviewed by someone who doesn’t really know what I do?
Second is the overall unwillingness to engage with the subject matter. I joke constantly (and it does amuse me) that my colleague is the ‘dreams girl’ and I’m the ‘AIDS girl’ it’s funny because she’s nice and lovely just like her research suggests and I’m well, dark and twisty like my work suggests. What isn’t funny is that people can’t bring themselves to say AIDS, can’t bring themselves to acknowledge what I’m doing. On one hand this is fuel to the fire, a reason to keep going to do this work. On the other to constantly smack against a wall of and I’ll say it homophobia and discrimination makes me want to curl into a ball and cry. I wont because that’s part of the reason to do this, but it doesn’t make it any less difficult.
I do wish sometimes, often actually, that I’d chosen-no not chosen it wasn’t a choice, been able to go to one of the Universities where mine would have been one of many similar research topics, either on LGBT issues, gender issues or hell I’d even settle for drama based. I wish I could be in an environment where I could be allowed to do what I wanted and what I needed unchallenged in the constant and frustrating way I am here. I know I need to be challenged but there is a difference between productive and unproductive challenges.
Normally, previously my response to this type of challenge is to fight but I’m tired a year in I’m so tired of constantly justifying my place, my work.  In the long run perhaps it will make the work better, make me a better person.
For now I'm taking the approach 'what doesn't kill me doesn't kill me.'

Comments

  1. You're doing important work. Some people don't know how to talk about AIDS, don't even know how to think about it without flinching away, and that's why what you're doing is needed. You'll win her over, I know it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theatre Fangirls (here we go again)

There's some arguments that come around and you think 'really? we're still talking about this?' but also you're not really surprised.

So when it was annoucned Tom Hiddleston was teaming up with Kenneth Brannagh for a production of Hamlet, it was inevitable that the cries of  'Silly fangirls' began. Once again we're confronted with comments that girls 'Only want to see it because he's in it' and 'Aren't interested in the play'.

And because I am a woman, therefore incapable of thinking of him other than in terms of his looks....here he above with a cat looking cute.

But just like Mr H there is both petting a cat, reading a newspaper and looking brooding, I'd like to point out that it's entierly possible to be interested in more than one aspect of a thing at the same time. And secondly I say so what the audience is just there to look at his cheekbones?

I don't have a horse in this race. I think Hiddles is a damn good ac…

Why Elliott & Harper is the company I've been waiting for

I can never resist a good (bad) pun in a title. As the first production from Elliott & Harper opens its doors for previews tonight, it’s worth pausing to think what this new production company means and why indeed we need more like it. Something of a ‘power house’ company formed of Marianne Elliott and Chris Harper. Both coming from the National Theatre- as Director and Producer respectively- there’s a real understanding of both the craft of theatre and the audiences that do- and don’t- come to it there. And theatre made by and produced by theatre people, in the commercial realm. That’s potentially very exciting.








Firstly, the act of two theatre people who really love theatre, really understand theatre both from an audience point of view and an artistic point of view. Secondly, one of the UK’s best directors striking out on her own to make theatre on her own terms. Thirdly, and you bet it’s an important factor, a woman artistic director. It’s all exciting, and has the potential, …

Angels at the National (a reflection before the review)

I had to do a Kushner and give this post a long subtitle.

When I called my PhD thesis "Angels at the National" (I write terrible titles I know) I never thought I'd be able to say it again. Of course, the Gods like to have a laugh at my expense so mere months after I bound the copy, Rufus Norris and Marianne Elliot got together and decided that I clearly hadn't had enough to write about. 


But how does it feel to have the thing that has lived in your head for so long, back, brought to life in front of you? As much as I love the plays, I'm also conditioned to be hyper critical. I know every line (I amazed/freaked out Elliot herself with my ability to know exact quotations on demand). And of course, I have my own expectations about how it should be. How then would it feel to go back? 



At the end of Part 1 I found myself leaning on the railings by the Thames, trying to compose myself and my thoughts enough to move. At the end of Part 2, I'm sure I had forgotten how …